Two Handed Warriors

Scripture and Culture-Making: What Christian Colleges could Learn from Rabbinic Higher Education

“If the Torah cannot go out into your world of scholarship and return stronger, then we are all fools and charlatans. I have faith in the Torah. I am not afraid of truth.”
                                            -Chaim Potok, In the Beginning
by Gary David Stratton
N.T. Wright concludes The Challenge of Jesus with his own challenge to 21st Century Christians:
“The gospel of Jesus points us and indeed urges us to be at the leading edge of the whole culture, articulating in story and music and art and philosophy and education and poetry and politics and theology and even–heaven help us–Biblical studies, a worldview that will mount the historically-rooted Christian challenge to both modernity and postmodernity, leading the way…with joy and humor and gentleness and good judgment and true wisdom. I believe if we face the question, ‘if not now, then when?’ if we are grasped by this vision we may also hear the question, ‘if not us, then who? And if the gospel of Jesus is not the key to this task, then what is?”
Wright’s challenge begs the question: Do twenty-first-century Christian colleges hold the gospel of Rabbi Jesus in as high a regard as first-century Jewish educators held the Torah?
Like Greco-Roman higher education, Rabbinic higher education was deeply devoted to the development of the life of the mind in close-knit learning communities.  However, the distinguishing characteristic of Rabbinic Higher Education was not so much its pedagogy as its remarkable devotion to its subject matter–Torah. Whereas Greco-Roman students were expected to master the ever-changing philosophies of their masters, students in Rabbinic higher education strove for mastery of the unchanging word of God. The “words of Torah were essentially divine.  God’s words were part and parcel of God’s essence” (Hirshman, 2009, p. 30).
Faithfulness Before Innovation
This devotion to the word of God resulted in a corresponding commitment to faithfulness versus novelty in Jewish education. “No one was free to choose his own credo or ignore the sage’s mediation in approaching the divine… The way of life was learned, and the worldview the product of particular knowledge and distinctive modes of thinking about and analyzing that knowledge.”  The object of Jewish higher education was “full mastery of God’s word and full understanding of it…” resulting in an intimacy with the words of Torah” written on the pages of the heart (Neusner, 1999, p. iii). Education, or more particularly, learning Torah, became “the Jewish religious pursuit par excellence…” (Hirshman, p. 3, 30). In short, they were very much “two-handed warriors.”
Jewish boys (and many girls) entered Beit Sefer (primary school) charged with mastering the Torah before the age of thirteen. This mastery often extended to the oral memorization of enormous portions of the Torah, as well as rudimentary reading and writing.  After their bar mitzvah and their corresponding accountability for obedience to the law, the best students were allowed to go on to  Beit Midrash (secondary school, literally, “study house”), while they learned a trade. The Beit Midrash curriculum added the study of the Writings and the Prophets to that of Torah, and more importantly, Talmud, the art of Rabbinic interpretations comprised of both Midrash—inquiry into the sacred texts, and Mishna, the study of oral law independent of its scriptural basis.
Rabbinic Higher Education
Only the most remarkable secondary students were allowed to go on to the Jewish version of higher education, by obtaining permission to study as a talmid (disciple/student) of a great Rabbi.  Teaching Rabbis made up a “collegium of sages” responsible for applying the law of God in new situations and for passing on the tradition of scriptural interpretation to new students. “Each begins as a disciple of a master, then himself becomes a master to the next generation of disciples, in a long chain of learning” (Neusner, p. iv).
The goal of faithfulness to the word of God drove the master-student relationship and teaching style of the study house. Rabbinic education was consumed with recitation and discussion, not merely because of pedagogical considerations, but also for theological reasons. The Rabbis so reverenced the written words of Scripture, no other texts were considered worthy of study. Rabbinic higher education was an oral culture, perpetrated and preserved by an ongoing high-level discussion that eclipsed even Socratic dialogue in its relentless back and forth nature.

Rabbi Hillel and his Talmidim (Unattributed)

In order to facilitate this dialogue, Talmidim were expected to follow their master night-and-day as they taught their tight-knit band of brothers in the study house, over meals, and in the market place. “Study was a process of unending repetition and ubiquitous recitation that transpired in almost every possible venue” (Chilton, and Neusner, 2005, p. 131-132). A good disciple stuck so closely to his teacher that by the end of the day he was literally covered with the dust kicked up by his master’s feet (Vander Laan). Through it all, Talmidim strove to attain the prerequisite mastery of Torah, Midrash, and Mishnah necessary to become sages themselves. Then they too could join the unbroken chain of faithfulness.
From Studying Scripture to Making Culture
Most importantly for our discussion, the goal of this remarkable devotion to the word of God was not a privatized faith, but public culture-making. Rabbinic education was birthed in the cultural crisis of the Babylonian captivity and is certainly the best human explanation of how Jewish culture survived the Diaspora. While Moses commanded the night and day impartation of Torah to the next generation, leading Torah historian, Wilhelm Bacher, notes that Nehemiah’s reading the Torah before the post-exilic community in Jerusalem was the actual “birthday of ancient Jewish education” (cited in Hirshman, p. 121.) Jewish leaders were painfully aware of their society’s need for leaders soaked in the culture-making power of the word of God. “According to the Rabbinic ideal, all of Israel would-be teachers, and ultimately masters, of Torah” (Chilton, p. 46). Only then could Jewish society reflect the Torah’s call for justice, charitable acts, gifts of first fruits and sacrifices (Hirshman, p. 19).
When the cultural chips were down, Rabbis had the courage to contrast the culture-making power of the Jewish study house, not with the Greco-Roman education, but with the theatre and circus, “pitting the two against one another on the level of popular culture” (Hirshman, p. 121). In most Roman cities the circus/theater and beit Midrash were within blocks of one another. However, unlike the Romans, Jewish commitment to the word of God led to a stronger emphasis on education than entertainment. Romans flocked to bread and circus, while Jews gathered to study. The Rabbis were confident that, in the end, their deep culture would triumph over Rome’s shallow culture. The beit Midrash had helped them endure the cultural onslaught of Babylon and Persia. Rome would be no match for them. And while the process took much longer than they could have ever imagined, it was a strategy that stood the test of time.
From Deuteronomy to the SAT
Moses with the Ten Commandments (Philippe de Champaigne, 1648, Hermitage Museum, Saint Petersburg, Russia)

Moses with the Ten Commandments (Philippe de Champaigne, 1648, Hermitage Museum, Saint Petersburg, Russia)

It doesn’t take any stretch of the imagination to envision how this principle might apply to twenty-first-century educators seeking to develop two-handed warriors fluent in both faith-building and culture-making. Entrance into Rabbinical higher education required an oral recitation of the entire Torah. Entrance to most Christian colleges today requires little more than an SAT score of 1500.  Entrance to early American liberal arts colleges required a comprehensive grasp of the English Bible. Graduation from most Christian colleges today requires little more than a rudimentary understanding of Scripture. Is it any wonder that pop culture is shaping our students more than their faith?
Whether one is referring to Catholics or Protestants, today’s ‘Christian culture’ is a mile wide and an inch deep. Education is losing out to entertainment at every level. As much as I value the culture-making force of the entertainment industry, the arts nearly always follow the intellectual currents of the day (Hunter, 2010, p. 87-88), and the only intellectual current flowing in pop culture today is a narcissistic, consumer-driven, individualism.
Christian Smith and Melinda Lundquist Denton’s research into American youth culture discovered:
“Many teenagers know abundant details about the lives of favorite musicians and television stars or about what it takes to get into a good college, but most are not very clear on who Moses and Jesus were.”
As a result, “a strong, visible, salient, or intentional faith is not operating in the foreground of most teenager’s lives.” Their worldview is little more than “moralistic, therapeutic, deism,” or more specifically, “whatever.”
For Protestant and Catholic colleges and universities to be of any value in helping our faith communities resist this pop-culture onslaught and grow into vibrant culture-making institutions ourselves we need to return to the wisdom of the Rabbi’s—a rigorous devotion to the word of God. Not a pre-critical naive commitment, but one that equips our students for the challenges of the modern (and postmodern) world. As Chaim Potok voices in his novel, In the Beginning: “If the Torah cannot go out into your world of scholarship and return stronger, then we are all fools and charlatans. I have faith in the Torah. I am not afraid of truth.”
The sages of the Rabbinic schools might dare ask the leaders of today’s Christian colleges, “Do you have faith in the word of God?” Sometimes, I’m not so sure we do. Our curriculum and campus culture certainly don’t always appear to reflect that kind of faith. At least not in comparison to the Rabbinic schools.
Chaim Potok voiced this deep commitment to scripture in his novel, In the Beginning: “If the Torah cannot go out into your world of scholarship and return stronger, then we are all fools and charlatans. I have faith in the Torah. I am not afraid of truth.” I suspect that our best hope for prevailing in the struggle for the souls of our colleges and universities may be engaging in this kind of Rabbinic commitment to the mastery of the worldview-forming, character-shaping narratives of Scripture.
I am not talking about a lightweight devotional band-aid, but an intellectually challenging and spiritually enriching student-teacher dialogue capable of dominating our campus culture,  capturing the minds and hearts and our students, and equipping them to go forth into the world of scholarship, church, and society as agents of biblical transformation. Anything less may very well result in a cultural exile from which we will never return. As N.T. Wright challenges us: “If the gospel of Jesus is not the key to this task, then what is?  If not us, then who? If not now, then when?”
Next post in the series: With Prayer in the School of Christ: The Liberal Arts and the Knowledge of God.
Part 3 in series: The Holy Spirit and the Liberal Arts: The Future of ‘Two Handed’ Higher Education
Notes
Wilhelm Bacher, Tradition und Tradenten in den Schulen Palästinas und Babyloniens: Studien und Materialien zur Entstehungsgeschichte des Talmud. (Berlin: W. de Gruyter, 1966).
Bruce Chilton, and Jacob Neusner, “Paul and Gamaliel.” In, Alan J. Avery-Peck, ed. Review of Rabbinic Judaism. (Leiden: Brill, 2005).
Marc G. Hirshman, The stabilization of rabbinic culture, 100 C.E.-350 C.E.: texts on education and their late antique context (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).
James Davidson Hunter, To change the world: the irony, tragedy, and possibility of Christianity in the late modern world. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010).
Jacob Neusner, The four stages of rabbinic Judaism (London: Routledge, 1999).
Chaim Potok, In the beginning. (New York: Knopf, 1975).
Christian Smith, and Melinda Lundquist Denton. Soul searching: the religious and spiritual lives of American teenagers. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).
Richard Valantasis, Douglas K. Bleyle, and Dennis C. Haugh, The Gospels and Christian life in history and practice (Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2009).
Ray Vander Laan, Stephen Sorenson, and Amanda Sorenson. In the dust of the rabbi: 5 faith lessons. (Grand Rapids, Mich: Zondervan, 2006). See also, Ray Vander Laan’s excellent website, Followtherabbi.com.
N.T. Wright. The Challenge of Jesus: rediscovering who Jesus was and is. (Downers Grove, Ill: InterVarsity Press, 1999.)

10 thoughts on “Scripture and Culture-Making: What Christian Colleges could Learn from Rabbinic Higher Education

  1. Pingback: A lazy blog about Rabbinic Higher Education | Joshua Encinias

  2. Pingback: Do America’s Schools and Churches Need ‘Revival’? The Culture-making Power of Spiritual Awakening | Two Handed Warriors

  3. Pingback: Soul-Nourishing Practices in a Soul-Deadening World: Connecting to the Life of God in Hollywood, the Ivy League, and Beyond | Two Handed Warriors

  4. Pingback: Saint Patrick and the Liberal Arts: The Future of Christian Higher Education | Two Handed Warriors

  5. ronjes100

    Question: Any suggestions for how to promote intellectually-challenging and spiritually-enriching study of the narratives of Scripture on our campuses?
    Answer: One means would be more open forums with Professors (as pictured above with Rabbi Hillel). I find that the time needed in class for achieving syllabus objectives and the transfer of packaged information leaves little time for extended open dialogue on a particular subject. Yet, It is in the atmosphere of uninhibited and open dialogue where I really learn and retain information.
    It would be cool to see one forum a week with a significant professor or two surrounding a scriptual topic that is relavent to cultural life and practice. A prime example was the professor/student forum held at my college, Bethel St. Paul, that surrounded the GLBT issue. It was invigorating to hear both the passion of the students as well as the mature consideration and love that the residing professors tendered back on the subject. While that was a huge one time formal forum, small regular informal forums would be just as awesome and instructive.
    As it has been going so far, the real time open dialogue I have with professors will amount to something like about 12 hours for $40k by the end of my degree.

    1. Aaron Stetson

      @ RonJones – Pursue your professors! My experience at Gordon College was that any professor I pursued was very excited to spend time with me on a 1 on 1 basis. Gary Stratton being one of them. Your education is what you make of it, don’t be passive, don’t expect people to come to you. Pursue professors and administrators for a mentoring relationship, ask them about interning with them on summer projects. I learned infinitely more from the time I spent with my professors outside of class. 2 of them i am still very close with 10 years after graduation and see them on a regular basis.

      @ Gary, great article!! “Rigorous Devotion to the Word of God” there is such a temptation for Christian Colleges and university to abandon certain things in order to become relevant or maybe to pursue on a little to great a scale things that are trendy i.e. environmental stewardship. These things are good things, however when being green gets placed on the same playing field as being a disciple something is a little off. Or maybe for those of us serving in the Presbyterian denomination when the book of order is as highly regarded as the scriptures we could and do have problems.
      All in all great article, great thoughts on returning to a “:rigorous devotion to scripture.”

      Aaron

      1. Gary David Stratton

        Thanks, Aaron! It is fascinating how quickly we abandon the things that make us unique in order to become like “everyone else.” It is a kind of idolatry, and the same kind Israel suffered from BEFORE their Captivity. I wonder what kind of Captivity we might need to suffer before we hold fast to our unique and powerful texts.

  6. Pingback: The Greco-Roman Liberal Arts (or, Why students shouldn’t feel like numbers) | Two Handed Warriors

  7. Pingback: With Prayer in the School of Christ: The Liberal Arts and the Knowledge of God | Two Handed Warriors

  8. Pingback: The Synagogue for the Performing Arts: Culture Making and Torah | Two Handed Warriors

Join the conversation!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.